Portable #cnc plamsma cutting machine for sale #plasmacutting #metal #stainlesssteel cutter
Effective cut area size mm:
1300x1300 1000x1500 1300x2500 1600*3000
Recommend plasma power 80-200A
Recommend screw air compressor
Motor Type | Stepper or Servo Motor |
Condition | New |
Place of Origin | Anhui, China |
Weight (KG) | 38 KG |
Warranty | 2 years |
Key Selling Points | High Productivity |
Applicable Industries | Garment Shops, Building Material Shops, Construction works |
Showroom Location | United States, Germany, Philippines, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Spain, Morocco, Algeria, Sri Lanka |
Marketing Type | Hot Product 2021 |
Machinery Test Report | Provided |
Video outgoing-inspection | Provided |
Warranty of core components | 2 years |
Core ComponentsCore Components | Bearing, Pump, Gear, Motor, Gearbox, PLC, Pressure vessel, Engine |
Dimensions | 1000*1500MM |
Brand Name | TOPLOONG |
Model Number | 1530 /1630 /2430 /2030 /2060 |
Voltage | 380V/220V |
Rated Power | 10-50KW |
Dimension(L*W*H) | 3.7*2.25*1.7 m |
Year | 2019 |
Cutting mode | Plasma Cutting+ Flame Cutting |
Product name | CNC Plasma Metal Cutting Machine |
Application | Sheet Metal Industry |
Name | Cnc Plasma Cutting Machine Table |
Type | Metal Cutting Tools |
Function | Cutting Steel Cnc Plasma Cutter |
Cutting material | Metal .alloy Metal .aluminum.stainless Steel |
Keywords | Plasma Cutting Machine Cnc Plasma |
Cutting thickness | 0-150mm |
Control system | Toploong+ Built in THC Controller |
motor | Servo |
200A CNC Plasma Cutter VS 6000W CNC Laser Cutter: A Comparative Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages, by using the same auxiliary gas—a screw air compressor with cold drying function (340L, 13-16bar, 20-30hp), we compare the performance of the 200A CNC plasma cutter and the 6000W CNC laser cutter.
1. Comparison of Cutting Thickness: The 200A plasma cutter easily handles metal plates of 26mm and above, while the 6000W laser cutter has a limit of only 25mm steel plates.
2. Competition in Cutting Speed: In terms of speed, the 200A plasma cutter leads with a speed of 0.8m/min, while the 6000W laser cutter operates at 0.4m/min, making the plasma cutter significantly faster.
3. Observation of Cut Quality: The plasma cutter produces a smooth and flat cut with no bevel, and its parameter settings are straightforward. While the laser cutter also achieves a bevel-free cut, the cutting surface has a texture that difficult reach a mirror-like finish.
4. Analysis of Material Adaptability: The plasma cutter can handle almost any type of metal for cutting, whereas the laser cutter exhibits significant differences in cutting capabilities for different metals.
5. Comparison of Machine Cost: In terms of price, the complete set of the 200A CNC plasma cutter costs only $3300, while the full set of the 6000W CNC laser cutter is significantly more expensive.
6. Consideration of Transportation Cost: In terms of packaging and transportation, the plasma cutter's complete set comes in a single cubic meter and weighs 350kg, while the laser cutter occupies 16 cubic meters and weighs up to 2000kg. This means that in terms of packaging costs and international shipping fees, the plasma cutter can save a considerable amount of money, saving at least $2000.
7. Analysis of Operating Cost: When cutting 25mm material, the 200A plasma cutter has an average power consumption of 40KW, while the laser cutter consumes a much higher average power of 60KW, resulting in higher costs. Although the main consumables—the plasma cutter's nozzle and the laser cutter's protective lens—are both relatively inexpensive (around $1.3 each), the plasma cutter still holds an advantage in terms of power consumption.
In summary, the 200A CNC plasma cutter excels in areas such as cutting thickness, speed, cut quality, material adaptability, machine cost, and transportation cost. Especially when dealing with high-power consumption and efficient cutting demands, its advantages become even more apparent. While the 6000W CNC laser cutter may have unique applications in certain scenarios, its overall performance and cost-effectiveness pale in comparison.